Insight News Media reported the information.A network of websites operating across Austria, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Slovakia, and Poland has been systematically amplifying Russian talking points about the war in Ukraine, framing the war as essentially over and portraying any peace settlement as requiring Kyiv's capitulation to Moscow's demands.The investigation found these outlets consistently present several key themes: that Ukraine's military position is hopeless, that NATO's support has failed, and that European leaders are irrationally blocking peace by refusing to accept Russia's conditions.Austrian site tkp.at characterized potential peace negotiations as "Minsk 3.0," arguing in its coverage that believing Ukraine could challenge Russia's military capabilities was fundamentally misguided. The outlet suggested any U.S. peace initiative merely aims to freeze the conflict temporarily.Dutch platform frontnieuws.com described American peace proposals as a veiled admission of strategic failure, stating that NATO has lost its proxy war and that Washington is attempting to mask this outcome.Italian site controinformazione.info claimed the Kyiv government continues to experience major battlefield setbacks, describing this as deeply concerning for both Washington and Brussels. The outlet portrayed Russian negotiators as operating from a position of complete confidence due to military superiority.Several sites promoted the narrative that Russian forces are nearing decisive victories in the Donbas region. Coverage claimed the fall of strategic cities would open the path for Moscow to achieve its territorial objectives regardless of diplomatic outcomes.A recurring theme across these platforms places responsibility for prolonging the conflict on European nations rather than Russia. One Dutch outlet suggested European leaders were obstructing serious peace efforts because they feared becoming irrelevant in negotiations.The investigation concluded that this messaging represents a deliberate cross-border campaign to condition European audiences to view Russia's maximalist demands—including recognition of annexed territories, Ukrainian demilitarization, and permanent neutrality—as the inevitable and only realistic foundation for ending the war.While these websites are formally based in EU member states, their content functions to amplify Kremlin strategic narratives rather than provide independent analysis, according to the report. The coordinated nature of the messaging suggests an organized effort to shape public perception across Europe's information landscape as high-level diplomatic discussions continue.