Ukrainian politician and diplomat Roman Bezsmertnyi said this in an interview with Antin Borkovskyi, host of the Studio West program on Espreso TV."If we characterize the speeches delivered, especially by Xi Jinping, at the SCO, at the parade, and in the evening reception, it is a claim to a new world order. These five principles announced by Xi Jinping represent his understanding and vision of the future world. But here it is important to understand that these 'good intentions' voiced actually imply the establishment of a totalitarian regime in the world. And the parade is a demonstration that China can ensure this in such a way. Note — if the illustration of the SCO was the trio Xi – Modi – Putin, then the demonstration of the parade and power was the trio Xi – Putin – Kim Jong Un. These are absolutely different things. From such external reflections, one must begin to analyze how it looks as a coherent understanding," commented Roman Bezsmertnyi.According to him, the fact that Modi did not stay for the parade indicates that all this is more a demonstration than reality. Although it should not be underestimated, as it is a claim to a new world order, to leadership."What is the proof of the dangerous component? If you analyze all the speeches more deeply, it is about rewriting history. It is very important to feel that there is no anti-Hitler coalition, but rather the victory of Russia and China, specifically communist China. In this regard, it is appropriate to ask why communist China, when that China and that army are the army of General Chiang Kai-shek, and Mao Zedong has absolutely nothing to do with it, nor does his army. This is the first — rewriting history. The second is the appropriation of certain fragments of history, when Mao Zedong and the Communist Party of China are credited with the victory. I won’t even mention that all other fragments revolve around the axis of this history 'Russia and China,'" the politician noted.In his opinion, there is another dangerous signal in this regard — the constant talk about finally having the "correct history," the "correct narrative of World War II." However, here too, there is a complete rewriting, and there is constant parasitism on the martyrs and victims of this war. This is a typical totalitarian move, used by the Stalinist regime, the Nazi, the fascist, and the current Russian regime also parasitizes on this."Behind this is the imposition on the current and future generations of the principle that it is better to die than to surrender. And this principle, which is constantly sounded, is parasitism in the past. This is against the backdrop of militarization, which China verbally opposes, but in reality says one thing — the system is preparing for war because it begins to impose moralizing narratives, narratives that parasitize on the memory of war victims," Bezsmertnyi said.On September 2, Xi Jinping held a meeting with Vladimir Putin in Beijing and stated that both states should work more actively on coordinating their interests.