The author of the Resurgam channel and expert in foreign relations shared his opinions on Telegram.According to Hegseth, the pause is based on Pentagon stock levels: “Shipments are on hold until inventory reaches threshold values.” But the author argues this is more than a routine check, it's a political maneuver.This is Hegseth’s second attempt to block military aid promised to Ukraine by the previous administration. His first try in spring failed under congressional pressure. This time, he’s acting more carefully — freezing only part of the aid, including critical systems like PAC-3 and GMLRS, while using language like “inventory audit” instead of “cancellation.”“He’s slicing the elephant,” the author noted, breaking down the broader goal of ending support into smaller, less noticeable moves. The redirection of interceptor missiles to Israel, which received little backlash, served as a test case.To avoid criticism, Hegseth also built a legal buffer. A report by Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby confirmed that some weapon stocks are indeed below critical levels. That became the official basis for his decision.This effort coincides with Hegseth’s rising influence in Trump’s circle after the Iran operation, despite earlier rumors of his potential dismissal. The author now questions whether this is a solo move or part of a broader Trump-aligned strategy.The response, says the Ukrainian analyst, must be swift and firm. “Silence only encourages Hegseth,” the article warns. “The longer we delay a public response, the harder it becomes to stop him.”The proposed solution: raise the issue publicly, even at the risk of diplomatic strain. Ask Trump: At the NATO summit, you promised to help protect Ukraine’s skies. How do you explain this delay?The author argues that this slow rollback of aid empowers Putin and undermines U.S. credibility. Every pause sends a message, the piece concludes. The world needs to hear it loud and clear: the U.S. is backing off or standing strong.